Ho (Migration)

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) considered the cancellation of a Subclass 143 (Contributory Parent) visa held by an applicant identified as Ho. The dispute concerned whether the applicant had complied with the requirements of section 107 of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth) and, if not, whether the visa should be cancelled.

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was to determine if the applicant had failed to comply with the obligations under section 107 of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth). Following this, the Tribunal was required to consider all relevant circumstances to decide whether, in the exercise of its discretion, the visa cancellation should be affirmed.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had indeed failed to comply with the requirements as outlined in the notice given under section 107 of the Act. Having regard to all the relevant circumstances, the Tribunal concluded that the cancellation of the applicant's visa was appropriate and therefore affirmed the decision to cancel the Subclass 143 (Contributory Parent) visa.