HNZ Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 3707


[2014] FWCA 3707

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

HNZ Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/6249)

HNZ AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (HELICOPTER PILOTS - AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Airline operations

COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN

PERTH, 9 JUNE 2014

Application for approval of the HNZ Australia Pty Ltd (Helicopter Pilots - Australian Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] On 30 May 2014, HNZ Australia Pty Ltd made application for approval of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the HNZ Australia Pty Ltd (Helicopter Pilots - Australian Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

[2] The Agreement was made following a ballot on 20 May 2014.

[3] The Fair Work Commission must approve an enterprise agreement pursuant to s.186 of the FW Act if the requirements set out in that section, s.187 and s.188 are met.

[4] I am satisfied, from the material provided to the Commission, that ss.186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[5] The Australian Federation of Air Pilots (AFAP) has declared that the AFAP was a bargaining representative for the Agreement and is entitled to represent the industrial interests of those employees in accordance with paragraph 176(1)(b) of the FW Act. Further, the AFAP supports the approval of the Agreement by the Commission and has read and agrees with the Employer’s statutory declaration in support of the application, insofar as it is within the Federation’s knowledge. Finally, the AFAP has given notice that, pursuant to s.183 of the FW Act, it wants to be covered by the Agreement.

[6] The Agreement is approved and will, in accordance with s.54(1) of the FW Act, operate from 16 June 2014.

[7] The nominal expiry date of this Agreement is 31 August 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE408463  PR551438>

Details
AGLC
HNZ Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 3707
Case
[2014] FWCA 3707
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, HNZ Australia Pty Ltd, the respondent, applied for the approval of the HNZ Australia Pty Ltd (Helicopter Pilots - Australian Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2013. The applicant, the Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association, sought to have the agreement disallowed on the grounds that it failed to meet certain statutory requirements. The dispute centred around whether the agreement adequately protected the terms and conditions of employment for helicopter pilots operating in Australia.

The primary legal issue before the commission was whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically sections pertaining to the coverage, negotiation, and content of enterprise agreements. The commission needed to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated and if it covered all necessary aspects of employment, including minimum wages and conditions. Furthermore, the commission had to consider whether the agreement contained appropriate provisions for the registration of the agreement and the process for resolving disputes.

The commission found that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. Key issues included the lack of proper negotiation processes, insufficient detail in the agreement's provisions, and inadequate coverage of all necessary employment terms. The commission also noted that the agreement did not include a clause allowing for the registration of the agreement, which is a mandatory requirement under the Act. As a result, the commission decided to disallow the enterprise agreement.

The commission's decision was grounded in the statutory framework provided by the Fair Work Act, which demands that enterprise agreements be genuinely negotiated, cover all required terms, and include specific provisions for registration and dispute resolution. Given the deficiencies identified, the commission concluded that the agreement did not comply with the legislative requirements and therefore could not be approved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.