Hive & Wellness Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2020] FWCA 850


[2020] FWCA 850
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Hive & Wellness Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2020/8)

HIVE & WELLNESS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAKE

BRISBANE, 19 FEBRUARY 2020

Application for approval of the Hive & Wellness Enterprise Agreement 2021- approval under s 190 – undertakings – model consultation term – inconsistency with NES

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the Hive & Wellness Enterprise Agreement 2021 (Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Hive & Wellness Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant).

[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. In accordance with s 190, I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[4] The United Workers’ Union (UWU) was listed under the Form 16 as being involved in the agreement making process, however, they did not lodge a Form 18 in support of the agreement. I directed the UWU to respond on 12 February 2020, however no response was reached. My Associate contacted Mr Tim Kennedy, the listed contact person for the UWU, on 17 February 2020 to seek clarity on their position. On 18 February my Associate contacted the UWU again and was referred to Martin De Rooy, who provided a completed F18 the same day. The UWU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement supports the approval of the Agreement and has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[5] Pursuant to s 202(4) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  Clause 5.1 – Annual Leave, as it does not provide additional annual leave for shift workers;

  Clause 5.1(6) – Annual Leave, as it allows cashing out of annual leave where the remainder would be 4 weeks; and

  Clause 2.1.8 – Redundancy, which does not state that any decision not to pay redundancy on finding suitable other employment is upon an order by the FWC.

However, noting Clause 1.3 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 26 February 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 April 2021.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE507117  PR716805>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Hive & Wellness Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 850
Case
[2020] FWCA 850
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Hive & Wellness Australia Pty Ltd, the Fair Work Commission was called upon to consider the approval of the Hive & Wellness Enterprise Agreement 2021, in accordance with section 190 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was brought by the employer, Hive & Wellness Australia Pty Ltd, seeking the Commission's approval for the proposed enterprise agreement. The dispute centred on whether the agreement met the necessary standards of the Fair Work Act and whether it complied with the national employment standards.

The central legal issues for the Commission to address were whether the agreement provided for adequate consultation terms as required by the model enterprise agreement, and whether it contained any inconsistencies with the national employment standards. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the proposed terms and conditions of employment were fair and reasonable, and whether they adhered to the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act.

The Commission carefully examined the provisions of the agreement, focusing on the consultation terms and the alignment with the national employment standards. The analysis included a detailed review of the agreement's provisions to ensure they met the minimum standards prescribed by the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the proposed agreement included provisions that were consistent with the model enterprise agreement and the national employment standards, except for certain consultation terms which needed adjustment. After considering the employer's undertakings to modify these terms, the Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable.

Accordingly, the Fair Work Commission approved the Hive & Wellness Enterprise Agreement 2021, subject to the employer's undertaking to revise the consultation terms to align with the model enterprise agreement. The decision was made on the basis that, with the agreed modifications, the agreement would provide for fair and reasonable terms of employment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.