Hiu & Ling
Case
•
[2010] FamCA 743
•24 August 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hiu & Ling [2010] FamCA 743
[2010] FamCA 743
24 August 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Hiu & Ling*, heard before Mushin J, the dispute concerned the validity of a marriage and the potential prosecution of one of the parties. The applicant, Ms. Hui, sought orders relating to the marriage, while the respondent, Mr. Ling, gave evidence in the proceedings.
The court was required to determine whether the marriage solemnised between Ms. Hui and Mr. Ling was valid, and if not, to declare it null and void. Additionally, the court considered whether to grant a certificate under section 128 of the *Evidence Act 1995* (Cth) to Mr. Ling in respect of his evidence, and whether to refer the matter for consideration of a prosecution against Mr. Ling for a breach of section 94 of the *Marriage Act 1961* (Cth).
Mushin J reasoned that the marriage was void. The court granted a certificate under section 128 of the *Evidence Act 1995* (Cth) to Mr. Ling, protecting him from prosecution for giving evidence in the proceedings. The court declared the marriage absolutely null and void. Furthermore, the court ordered that relevant documents be referred to the Chief Justice for referral to the appropriate Commonwealth authority for consideration of prosecuting Mr. Ling for a breach of section 94 of the *Marriage Act 1961* (Cth). The court also certified that the matter reasonably required the attendance of counsel.
The court was required to determine whether the marriage solemnised between Ms. Hui and Mr. Ling was valid, and if not, to declare it null and void. Additionally, the court considered whether to grant a certificate under section 128 of the *Evidence Act 1995* (Cth) to Mr. Ling in respect of his evidence, and whether to refer the matter for consideration of a prosecution against Mr. Ling for a breach of section 94 of the *Marriage Act 1961* (Cth).
Mushin J reasoned that the marriage was void. The court granted a certificate under section 128 of the *Evidence Act 1995* (Cth) to Mr. Ling, protecting him from prosecution for giving evidence in the proceedings. The court declared the marriage absolutely null and void. Furthermore, the court ordered that relevant documents be referred to the Chief Justice for referral to the appropriate Commonwealth authority for consideration of prosecuting Mr. Ling for a breach of section 94 of the *Marriage Act 1961* (Cth). The court also certified that the matter reasonably required the attendance of counsel.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Evidence
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Breach
-
Charge
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Hiu & Ling [2010] FamCA 743
Most Recent Citation
Partlett & Partlett (No 2) [2021] FedCFamC1F 288
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Molina & Sanchez
[2021] FamCA 84
Kefel and Efstani
[2016] FamCA 515
JSING & KONG
[2016] FamCA 288
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
3
Todorovic v Waller
[1981] HCA 72
Todorovic v Waller
[1981] HCA 72