HINKLER & ANGLIN
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 2309
•22 August 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
HINKLER & ANGLIN [2019] FCCA 2309
[2019] FCCA 2309
22 August 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Hinkler & Anglin, heard by Judge Obradovic, the dispute concerned the adjustment of property interests between the parties. The court was tasked with determining how the parties' assets and financial resources should be divided.
The central legal issue before the court was the assessment of the parties' respective contributions to the marriage and their future needs in order to make a just and equitable property settlement. This involved considering both financial and non-financial contributions made by each party throughout the relationship.
Judge Obradovic ordered that the Respondent pay the Applicant the sum of $38,750, to be paid by way of fortnightly instalments of $150, commencing 28 days after the making of the orders. The Applicant was to retain all personal property and financial resources in his possession or control, including assets held in his sole name, such as shares, units in trusts, bank accounts, life insurance policies, and superannuation funds. Similarly, the Respondent was to retain all interest in the property located at G Street, Suburb H, New South Wales, and all personal property and financial resources in her possession or control, including assets held in her sole name. Each party was to remain liable for their respective debts incurred in their sole name and indemnify the other against any such liability.
The central legal issue before the court was the assessment of the parties' respective contributions to the marriage and their future needs in order to make a just and equitable property settlement. This involved considering both financial and non-financial contributions made by each party throughout the relationship.
Judge Obradovic ordered that the Respondent pay the Applicant the sum of $38,750, to be paid by way of fortnightly instalments of $150, commencing 28 days after the making of the orders. The Applicant was to retain all personal property and financial resources in his possession or control, including assets held in his sole name, such as shares, units in trusts, bank accounts, life insurance policies, and superannuation funds. Similarly, the Respondent was to retain all interest in the property located at G Street, Suburb H, New South Wales, and all personal property and financial resources in her possession or control, including assets held in her sole name. Each party was to remain liable for their respective debts incurred in their sole name and indemnify the other against any such liability.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
HINKLER & ANGLIN [2019] FCCA 2309
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
2
Stanford v Stanford
[2012] HCA 52
Bevan & Bevan
[2014] FamCAFC 19
Chapman & Chapman
[2014] FamCAFC 91