Hillman v T & R (Murray Bridge) Pty Ltd

Case

[2011] SASCFC 17

23 March 2011


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Hillman v T & R (Murray Bridge) Pty Ltd [2011] SASCFC 17 [2011] SASCFC 17 23 March 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The application for permission to appeal was brought by Hillman against T & R (Murray Bridge) Pty Ltd. The dispute concerned the meaning and effect of particulars supporting a complaint, and whether the Full Court of the Industrial Relations Court of South Australia erred in refusing to allow an amendment to those particulars.

The central legal issue before the Full Court was whether the particulars provided were sufficiently arguable to warrant a further appeal. Specifically, the court had to determine if there was an arguable case that the Industrial Relations Court had made an error in its decision regarding the amendment of the particulars.

The Full Court reasoned that the application did not raise any issue of principle that would justify granting permission to appeal. The court found that the meaning of the particulars was not sufficiently arguable to meet the threshold for an appeal. Consequently, the court concluded that this was not an appropriate case for a grant of permission to appeal.

The application for permission to appeal was refused.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Employment Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Jurisdiction

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1