Hijaz and Jessup and Anor

In the District Court of New South Wales, His Honour Judge Faulks DCJ presided over proceedings involving Hijaz and Jessup and Anor. The precise nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome was determined by consent orders.

The court was required to make orders in accordance with the agreement reached by the parties. This involved the formalisation of specific terms, identified as orders 1 to 11, and further orders detailed in minutes 12, 13, and 14 of a document previously presented to the court.

The court's reasoning was based on the consent of the parties, indicating their agreement on the terms of the resolution. His Honour Faulks DCJ indicated that he would make orders in accordance with the initialled and dated Consent Orders placed on the Court file, as well as the subsequent Minutes 12, 13, and 14.

By consent, the court ordered that orders 1 to 11 of the Consent Orders be made, and further ordered that orders be made in accordance with Minutes 12, 13, and 14 of the identified document.