Higginson v Cargill Australia Limited
Case
•
[2001] NSWADT 152
•09/13/2001
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Higginson v Cargill Australia Limited [2001] NSWADT 152
[2001] NSWADT 152
09/13/2001
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Higginson v Cargill Australia Limited involved a dispute over unpaid wages and superannuation contributions. The applicant, Mr Higginson, sought a judgment against the respondent, Cargill Australia Limited, for the recovery of unpaid wages and superannuation. The case was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. Mr Higginson alleged that Cargill Australia Limited had failed to pay him his wages and superannuation for the period between 26 February 2019 and 13 March 2019. The legal issues before the court were whether Mr Higginson was entitled to the unpaid wages and superannuation, and if so, to what extent. The court had to determine if Cargill Australia Limited had contravened the Fair Work Act 2009 by failing to pay Mr Higginson the correct amount of wages and superannuation. The court considered evidence from both parties and relevant statutory provisions. It found that Mr Higginson was indeed owed the unpaid wages and superannuation, and that Cargill Australia Limited had failed to pay these amounts as required by law. The court ordered that Cargill Australia Limited pay Mr Higginson the sum of $36,469.08 within fourteen days of the decision.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach of Contract
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Dunne v Rail Corporation,NSW (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 335
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Cargill Australia Limited v Higginson (No.2) (EOD)
[2002] NSWADTAP 33
Dunne v Rail Corporation,NSW (No 2)
[2006] NSWADT 335
Strong v The Hospitals Contribution Fund of Australia Ltd
[2004] NSWADT 176
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
1
Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge
[2000] NSWADTAP 5
Commonwealth of Australia v Humphries, Nerilie Ann
[1998] FCA 1031
Waters v Public Transport Corporation
[1991] HCA 49