Hibberson v George
Case
•
[1989] NSWCA 100
•13 February 1989
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hibberson v George [1989] NSWCA 100
[1989] NSWCA 100
13 February 1989
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Hibberson v George*, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered a dispute between the parties concerning a contract for the sale of land. The appellant, Hibberson, was the vendor and the respondent, George, was the purchaser. The core of the disagreement revolved around the interpretation of a special condition within the contract of sale.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the special condition, which stipulated that the sale was subject to the purchaser obtaining finance on terms satisfactory to the purchaser, had been validly satisfied or waived by the purchaser. The Court was required to determine the legal effect of the purchaser's actions and communications in relation to the finance condition.
The Court reasoned that the special condition imposed an obligation on the purchaser to take reasonable steps to obtain finance. However, it also conferred a discretion upon the purchaser to determine whether the terms of any finance obtained were satisfactory. The Court found that the purchaser had not acted unreasonably in their efforts to obtain finance and that their dissatisfaction with the terms offered was genuine. Consequently, the condition had not been satisfied, nor had it been waived by the purchaser's conduct. The appeal was dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the special condition, which stipulated that the sale was subject to the purchaser obtaining finance on terms satisfactory to the purchaser, had been validly satisfied or waived by the purchaser. The Court was required to determine the legal effect of the purchaser's actions and communications in relation to the finance condition.
The Court reasoned that the special condition imposed an obligation on the purchaser to take reasonable steps to obtain finance. However, it also conferred a discretion upon the purchaser to determine whether the terms of any finance obtained were satisfactory. The Court found that the purchaser had not acted unreasonably in their efforts to obtain finance and that their dissatisfaction with the terms offered was genuine. Consequently, the condition had not been satisfied, nor had it been waived by the purchaser's conduct. The appeal was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Damages
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Limitation Periods
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Hibberson v George [1989] NSWCA 100
Most Recent Citation
Sivritas v Sivritas [2008] VSC 374
Cases Citing This Decision
38
Sun v Chapman
[2022] NSWCA 132
Fung v Ye
[2007] NSWCA 115
Howland v Ellis
[2001] NSWCA 456
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0