Hibberd and Banner
Case
•
[2013] FamCA 1066
•13 December 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hibberd and Banner [2013] FamCA 1066
[2013] FamCA 1066
13 December 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Hibberd and Banner*, Austin J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application concerning the supervision of a child's time with the father. The dispute arose from previous orders made on 23 August 2013, which were being implemented, and subsequent applications filed by both the mother and the father.
The court was required to determine the specific arrangements for the supervision of the child's time with the father, as well as to consider and rule upon the applications filed by both the mother and the father, and any outstanding applications for interim orders.
Austin J ordered that for the purposes of implementing the existing orders, the child's time with the father was to be supervised by either the father's wife, Ms B Hibberd, the paternal grandfather, Mr C Hibberd, or the paternal grandmother, Ms D Hibberd. The mother's application filed on 23 September 2013 and the father's response filed on 5 November 2013 were both dismissed, as were any outstanding applications for interim orders. The court also directed that a sealed copy of these orders be sent to the Registrar of the Local Court of NSW at Town E and the Commissioner of the NSW Police Service due to an inconsistency with previous orders and an existing Apprehended Violence Order.
The court was required to determine the specific arrangements for the supervision of the child's time with the father, as well as to consider and rule upon the applications filed by both the mother and the father, and any outstanding applications for interim orders.
Austin J ordered that for the purposes of implementing the existing orders, the child's time with the father was to be supervised by either the father's wife, Ms B Hibberd, the paternal grandfather, Mr C Hibberd, or the paternal grandmother, Ms D Hibberd. The mother's application filed on 23 September 2013 and the father's response filed on 5 November 2013 were both dismissed, as were any outstanding applications for interim orders. The court also directed that a sealed copy of these orders be sent to the Registrar of the Local Court of NSW at Town E and the Commissioner of the NSW Police Service due to an inconsistency with previous orders and an existing Apprehended Violence Order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Hibberd and Banner [2013] FamCA 1066
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
3