HETT & SEER

In *Hett & Seer*, heard by Gill J, the dispute concerned the admissibility of evidence in family law proceedings. The husband sought to adduce his valuation of a property jointly held by the parties in City D, China.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the husband's valuation of the Chinese property was admissible as evidence in the proceedings.

Gill J determined that the husband's valuation was not admissible. The reasoning for this exclusion is not detailed in the provided text, but the order clearly indicates the court's decision on the admissibility of this specific piece of evidence.

The court ordered that the husband's valuation of the property jointly held by the parties in City D, China, is not admissible as evidence.