HESTON & NORTON AND ORS
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 154
•17 March 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
HESTON & NORTON AND ORS [2017] FamCA 154
[2017] FamCA 154
17 March 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned parenting orders sought by Mr Norton and Ms Heston regarding their three children. The dispute involved the court determining the future living arrangements and contact arrangements for the children.
The court was required to determine the issue of parental responsibility for the children, where the children should live, and the nature and extent of contact Ms Heston would have with the children. The court also had to consider the terms of any injunction to be granted and the allocation of costs associated with supervised contact.
Carew J ordered that all previous parenting orders be discharged. Mr Norton was granted sole parental responsibility for the children, and the children were ordered to live with him. Ms Heston was restrained from contacting or approaching the children or attending near their schools, except as provided for in the order. The order then set out a detailed schedule for Ms Heston to spend time with and communicate with the children, commencing with telephone or Skype contact and progressively increasing to alternate weekends and half of school holidays. This time was to be supervised, with costs to be borne equally. The court also made orders regarding the exchange of personal information, children's documents, and medical and educational information.
The court was required to determine the issue of parental responsibility for the children, where the children should live, and the nature and extent of contact Ms Heston would have with the children. The court also had to consider the terms of any injunction to be granted and the allocation of costs associated with supervised contact.
Carew J ordered that all previous parenting orders be discharged. Mr Norton was granted sole parental responsibility for the children, and the children were ordered to live with him. Ms Heston was restrained from contacting or approaching the children or attending near their schools, except as provided for in the order. The order then set out a detailed schedule for Ms Heston to spend time with and communicate with the children, commencing with telephone or Skype contact and progressively increasing to alternate weekends and half of school holidays. This time was to be supervised, with costs to be borne equally. The court also made orders regarding the exchange of personal information, children's documents, and medical and educational information.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
HESTON & NORTON AND ORS [2017] FamCA 154
Most Recent Citation
Oz Family Day Care Pty Ltd v Department of Education and Training [2017] QCAT 220
Cases Citing This Decision
1