Hesham Galam BY His Litigation Guardian Alzbeta Tichonova v Shahin
Case
•
[2023] HCASL 88
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hesham Galam BY His Litigation Guardian Alzbeta Tichonova v Shahin [2023] HCASL 88
[2023] HCASL 88
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case at hand involves Hesham Galam, represented by his litigation guardian Alzbeta Tichonova, against Shahin. The dispute pertains to an appeal against a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of South Australia, which was presided over by Doyle and Bleby JJ. The initial case was a complex one, touching upon various legal issues that required judicial scrutiny and resolution.
The legal issues central to this case revolved around the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision, the validity of the grounds for appeal, and the prospects of success if the appeal were to proceed to the High Court. The Court of Appeal had already meticulously reviewed the case, and the primary concern now was whether the High Court should entertain the appeal and, if so, whether it had any likelihood of success.
In evaluating the application for special leave to appeal, the High Court found that the decision of the Court of Appeal was both sound and well-reasoned. The justices concluded that there were no apparent grounds to question the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. Furthermore, it was determined that an appeal to the High Court would not have any prospects of success. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed.
As per the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the Registrar was directed to draft, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision underscores the rigorous scrutiny applied to appeals and the threshold that must be met for the High Court to consider such applications.
The legal issues central to this case revolved around the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision, the validity of the grounds for appeal, and the prospects of success if the appeal were to proceed to the High Court. The Court of Appeal had already meticulously reviewed the case, and the primary concern now was whether the High Court should entertain the appeal and, if so, whether it had any likelihood of success.
In evaluating the application for special leave to appeal, the High Court found that the decision of the Court of Appeal was both sound and well-reasoned. The justices concluded that there were no apparent grounds to question the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. Furthermore, it was determined that an appeal to the High Court would not have any prospects of success. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed.
As per the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the Registrar was directed to draft, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision underscores the rigorous scrutiny applied to appeals and the threshold that must be met for the High Court to consider such applications.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Kelly v UNSW [2025] NSWDC 24
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Kelly v UNSW
[2025] NSWDC 24
Woolf v Brandt
[2023] NSWDC 460
High Court Bulletin
[2023] HCAB 5
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0