| [2022] FWCA 960 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Herrenknecht (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2022/483)
Herrenknecht (Australia) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT YOUNG | MELBOURNE, 21 MARCH 2022 |
Application for approval of the Herrenknecht (Australia) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022
Herrenknecht (Australia) Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Herrenknecht (Australia) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, on the basis of the material contained in the application, and the accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement was approved on 21 March 2022 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 28 March 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 March 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515396 PR739462>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Herrenknecht (Australia) Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 960
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 960
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement had been fairly negotiated in accordance with the legislative requirements and whether the agreement provided for the minimum entitlements of employees as stipulated by the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the Commission needed to consider if the agreement met the good faith bargaining standard and if it adequately protected the rights and interests of the employees involved.
In delivering its decision, the Commission found that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that the parties had complied with the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. The Commission concluded that the agreement provided for the minimum entitlements of employees and was consistent with the principles of procedural fairness. The Commission also noted that the agreement contained provisions that went beyond the minimum requirements, providing additional protections and benefits to the employees. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, recognising its compliance with the statutory requirements and its fairness to both the employer and the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.