Hepples v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia
Case
•
[1992] HCATrans 43
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hepples v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [1992] HCATrans 43
[1992] HCATrans 43
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Hepples v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia*, the High Court of Australia was required to determine the form of orders to be made following its earlier judgment in the matter. The case concerned a dispute between Peter William Hepples and the Commissioner of Taxation.
The central legal issue before the Court was the precise wording and effect of the orders to be entered, following the Court's determination of the substantive appeal. The Court had previously delivered judgment, indicating its conclusion on the appeal, and now needed to finalise the consequential orders.
The Court, having heard further argument on the proposed forms of order, concluded that the orders it had indicated at the time of its judgment should be made. Mason CJ published the joint reasons of the Court for this conclusion, confirming the final disposition of the matter.
The central legal issue before the Court was the precise wording and effect of the orders to be entered, following the Court's determination of the substantive appeal. The Court had previously delivered judgment, indicating its conclusion on the appeal, and now needed to finalise the consequential orders.
The Court, having heard further argument on the proposed forms of order, concluded that the orders it had indicated at the time of its judgment should be made. Mason CJ published the joint reasons of the Court for this conclusion, confirming the final disposition of the matter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Tax Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Hepples v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [1992] HCATrans 43
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0