Hendy v Deputy Child Support Registrar

Case

[2001] FamCA 632

5 July 2001


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Hendy v Deputy Child Support Registrar [2001] FamCA 632 [2001] FamCA 632 5 July 2001

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Hendy v Deputy Child Support Registrar*, the Full Federal Court considered an appeal from a decision of a single judge of that court. The appellant, Mr Henderson, sought to challenge the validity of a child support assessment made by the Deputy Child Support Registrar. The core of the dispute concerned whether Mr Henderson had been properly notified of the assessment, and consequently, whether he had a right to object to it.

The primary legal issue before the Full Federal Court was whether the Registrar had complied with the procedural requirements of the *Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988* (Cth) when issuing the child support assessment. Specifically, the court had to determine if the notice of assessment sent to Mr Henderson was sent to his last known address, as required by the Act, and if the Registrar had taken reasonable steps to ensure he received it. This question was central to whether Mr Henderson had been afforded his statutory right to object to the assessment within the prescribed time.

The Full Federal Court reasoned that the Registrar's obligation under the Act was to send the notice to the last known address of the liable parent. The evidence indicated that the notice had been sent to an address that Mr Henderson had previously provided to the Registrar. While Mr Henderson argued he had moved and not received the notice, the court found that the Registrar had no further information to suggest that the address used was no longer his last known address. Therefore, the Registrar had discharged its statutory duty. The court upheld the validity of the assessment, finding that Mr Henderson had not been denied his right to object due to a failure by the Registrar to comply with the Act.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Jurisdiction

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Natural Justice

  • Appeal

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

49

Kildea & Kildea (No. 2) [2007] FamCA 1658
Kildea & Kildea (No. 2) [2007] FamCA 1658
Cases Cited

16

Statutory Material Cited

0