Hemelaar & Red v Walsh, Gough & State of Queensland
Case
•
[2017] QDC 151
•9 June 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hemelaar and Red v Walsh, Gough and State of Queensland [2017] QDC 151
[2017] QDC 151
9 June 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellants, Hemelaar and Red, sought review of a decision by a Magistrate that dismissed their claims against police officers and the State of Queensland for false imprisonment, assault, and malicious arrest. The incident arose when the appellants were arrested for failure to comply with a move on direction issued by the police, despite the appellants being participants in a public assembly deemed to be authorised under the Peaceful Assembly Act 1992. The appellants argued that the police lacked the authority to issue the move on direction and thus their arrest was unlawful. They further contended that the Magistrate erred in dismissing their claims of assault and malicious arrest and that the damages awarded for battery and false imprisonment were inadequate.
The court held that the police officers did not have the power to issue a move on direction in the circumstances and thus the arrests were unlawful. The court found that the Magistrate erred in dismissing the appellants' claims for assault and malicious arrest as the police officers lacked the legal authority to make the arrests. The court found that the damages awarded for battery and false imprisonment were inadequate and granted the appellants aggravated damages. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the orders made by the Magistrate, substituting them with new orders for judgment against the police officers and the State of Queensland for damages, along with interest.
The court directed the parties to provide a proposed form of order within 7 days, including as to costs, if agreed. If not agreed, the parties were directed to provide submissions in relation to the order as to costs sought, with the matter to be decided on the papers.
The court held that the police officers did not have the power to issue a move on direction in the circumstances and thus the arrests were unlawful. The court found that the Magistrate erred in dismissing the appellants' claims for assault and malicious arrest as the police officers lacked the legal authority to make the arrests. The court found that the damages awarded for battery and false imprisonment were inadequate and granted the appellants aggravated damages. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the orders made by the Magistrate, substituting them with new orders for judgment against the police officers and the State of Queensland for damages, along with interest.
The court directed the parties to provide a proposed form of order within 7 days, including as to costs, if agreed. If not agreed, the parties were directed to provide submissions in relation to the order as to costs sought, with the matter to be decided on the papers.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Tort Law
Legal Concepts
-
False Imprisonment
-
Malicious Prosecution
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Aggravated Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Burke v The State of Qld [2022] QDC 128
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Burke v The State of Qld
[2022] QDC 128
Berge v Thanarattanabodee
[2018] QDC 121
Johnson v The State of South Australia
[2019] SADC 35
Cases Cited
17
Statutory Material Cited
4
Lehmann v Warren
[2017] QDC 69
JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd v Precast Concrete Pty Ltd
[2010] QDC 272
White v Commissioner of Police
[2014] QCA 121