[2014] FWCA 4840 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Hella Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/6802)
HELLA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 18 JULY 2014 |
Application for approval of the HELLA Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the HELLA Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Hella Australia Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] An undertaking has been given in relation to clause 17.11(e) of the Agreement and this undertaking has become a term of the Agreement in accordance with s.191(2) of the Act and is appended at Appendix A.
[3] Subject to this undertaking I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union, The Australian Workers’ Union, National Union of Workers and United Voice, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers those organisations.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 25 July 2014.The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE409154 PR553304>
APPENDIX A
- AGLC
- Hella Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 4840
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4840
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was "better off overall" for the employees, and whether it adhered to the "no disadvantage test." This required the Commission to evaluate the provisions of the proposed agreement against the existing awards and conditions, and to ensure that the agreement did not disadvantage employees relative to their prior entitlements. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement contained provisions that were procedurally fair and in compliance with the Fair Work Act.
The Commission examined the evidence presented by both the employer and the employee representatives, including submissions on the economic and non-economic benefits of the agreement. The Commission found that the proposed agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees, with appropriate consideration of their interests. It determined that the agreement was better off overall for the employees, as it provided for increased remuneration and other benefits that outweighed any potential disadvantages. The Commission also concluded that the agreement complied with the no disadvantage test and was procedurally fair. Therefore, the Commission approved the Hella Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.