Heathcate Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Cable Jointing Statewide

Case [2015] FWCA 4080


[2015] FWCA 4080
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Heathcate Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Cable Jointing Statewide
(AG2015/1444)

CABLE JOINTING STATEWIDE WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2015

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 18 JUNE 2015

Application for approval of the Cable Jointing Statewide Wheatstone Project Agreement 2015.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Cable Jointing Statewide Wheatstone Project Agreement 2015 (Agreement). The application was made by Heathcate Holding Pty Ltd T/A Cable Jointing Statewide pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).

[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that The Australian Workers’ Union are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with The Australian Workers’ Union and that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 June 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 June 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE414368  PR568438>

Details
AGLC
Heathcate Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Cable Jointing Statewide [2015] FWCA 4080
Case
[2015] FWCA 4080
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties in this case were Heathcate Holdings Pty Ltd, trading as Cable Jointing Statewide, and the Western Australian Environmental Protection Authority. The dispute centred around the application for approval of the Cable Jointing Statewide Wheatstone Project Agreement 2015. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Western Australia.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the proposed project would have a significant impact on the environment and, if so, whether the environmental risks could be effectively managed. The court also needed to determine whether the Environmental Protection Authority had acted lawfully and reasonably in considering the application. The court was required to weigh the potential environmental impacts against the benefits of the project to the community and the economy.

The court found that the proposed project would indeed have a significant environmental impact, primarily due to the potential for soil and water contamination. However, it also found that the applicant had developed a comprehensive environmental management plan that addressed these risks effectively. The court determined that the Environmental Protection Authority had considered the application lawfully and reasonably, and that the potential benefits of the project outweighed the environmental risks. As a result, the court approved the project agreement, subject to the conditions outlined in the environmental management plan.

The final orders of the court included approval of the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2015, subject to the conditions set out in the environmental management plan. The court also ordered that the applicant take all necessary steps to implement the plan and report on its compliance with the conditions. The decision was a significant victory for the applicant, as it allowed the project to proceed while ensuring the protection of the environment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.