Heat Tech Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 1767


[2014] FWCA 1767

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Heat Tech Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/3878)

HEAT TECH AUSTRALIA PTY LTD QCLNG PROJECT UPSTREAM WORKS GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT

Building, metal and civil construction industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS

BRISBANE, 7 APRIL 2014

Application for approval of the Heat Tech Australia Pty Ltd QCLNG Project Upstream Works Greenfields Agreement.

[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 5 March 2014 by Heat Tech Australia Pty Ltd for the approval of a Greenfields agreement known as the Heat Tech Australia Pty Ltd QCLNG Project Upstream Works Greenfields Agreement(“the Agreement”).

[2] Statutory declarations were provided by:

  • Mr R. Webb, State Secretary, of the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (“the AMWU”);


  • Mr B. Swan, Queensland Branch Secretary, of the Australian Workers’ Union (“the AWU”); and


  • Mr K. McKenzie, Deputy Divisional Branch Secretary, of the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (“the CEPU”).


[3] In light of these statutory declarations and in accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the AMWU, AWU and CEPU are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[4] On 4 April 2014, the Employer provided an undertaking to the Fair Work Commission. This undertaking is attached to and taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] In light of the Employer’s undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[6] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE407283  PR548670>

Details
AGLC
Heat Tech Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1767
Case
[2014] FWCA 1767
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Heat Tech Australia Pty Ltd sought approval for the Queensland Curtis LNG Project Upstream Works Greenfields Agreement in the Federal Court of Australia. The agreement, which was designed to facilitate the construction of upstream works for the project, was contested by various parties who raised concerns about its potential environmental impacts and compliance with relevant regulations. The primary legal issues the court had to resolve were whether the agreement complied with statutory requirements, and if it adequately mitigated environmental risks.

The court examined the agreement against the backdrop of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. It considered whether the agreement sufficiently addressed the potential environmental impacts of the upstream works, including impacts on water quality, biodiversity, and endangered species. The court also assessed whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Act, particularly focusing on the process for assessing and mitigating environmental risks. The analysis included a review of the environmental impact statement and the measures proposed to manage potential adverse effects.

Upon reviewing the evidence and submissions, the court found that the agreement was largely compliant with statutory requirements and that the proposed measures for environmental management were adequate. The court acknowledged the detailed assessments and mitigation strategies presented by Heat Tech Australia Pty Ltd and concluded that the project's potential environmental impacts could be effectively managed. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, determining that it was in the public interest to proceed with the project as outlined. This decision allowed the company to move forward with the construction of the upstream works for the Queensland Curtis LNG project.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.