| [2025] FWC 189 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437A - Application for a protected action ballot order – multi-enterprise agreements
Health Services Union
v
Albury Wodonga Health and Others
(B2025/142)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 22 JANUARY 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballots of employees of Albury Wodonga Health and 18 other Victorian Public Sector healthcare employers employed in mental health services.
This decision concerns an application by the Health Services Union in the form of the Health and Community Services Union (HACSU or Applicant) made under s.437A of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for protected action ballot orders in relation to certain employees of 19 employers who are subject to a Single Interest Employer Authorisation (SIEA) issued by the Commission on 17 January 2025.[1] The SIEA has been issued in the context of a proposed multi-enterprise agreement.
The ballot application relates to 19 Victorian healthcare employers that are currently bargaining for the proposed Victorian Public Mental Health Services Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028 and are authorised to bargain together. The employers concerned are set out in Appendix A of this decision and are collectively referred to as the Employers.
Each of the Employers has appointed the Victorian Hospitals Industrial Association (VHIA) as their bargaining representative.
The group of employees to be balloted at each employer are employees for whom HACSU is acting as the barging representative and fall within the coverage of the SIEA; namely those employed as:
·Mental Health Service Officers;
·Facilities Services Officers;
·Registered Nurses;
·Enrolled Nurses;
·Health Professionals;
·Lived Experience Workers;
·Health and Allied Service Employees;
·Managers; and
·Administrative Officers
who are employed solely or predominantly in the provision of Public Mental Health Services, which refers to the service, department, unit or program of the Employer rather than the duties of an individual employee.
On 21 January 2025, the Commission was advised by the VHIA that the Employers did not object to the Application.
I also observe that the Commission raised with the parties concerns about the wording of some of the proposed ballot questions. Amended questions were proposed by HACSU, which addressed the concerns and have not been opposed by the Employers. In that light, I have amended the application accordingly.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Rebecca Sprekos, Acting State Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the HACSU in bargaining with the Employers and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with them, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballots are to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballots.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close in each ballot is 6 February 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order for each individual employer is set out below in Appendix A.
I observe for completeness as this matter involves bargaining for a multi-enterprise agreement, s.414 of the Act provides that the minimum period of written notice for any industrial action will be 120 hours.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference in relation to all matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Appendix A
| Employer | Print Number of Order |
| Albury Wodonga Health | PR783482 |
| Alfred Health | PR783483 |
| Austin Health | PR783484 |
| Barwon Health | PR783485 |
| Bendigo Health | PR783486 |
| Eastern Health | PR783487 |
| Goulburn Valley Health | PR783488 |
| Grampians Health | PR783489 |
| Latrobe Regional Health | PR783490 |
| Melbourne Health | PR783491 |
| Mercy Hospitals Victoria Ltd | PR783492 |
| Mildura Base Public Hospital | PR783493 |
| Monash Health | PR783495 |
| Northern Health | PR783496 |
| Peninsula Health | PR783497 |
| The Royal Children's Hospital | PR783498 |
| South West Healthcare | PR783499 |
| St. Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne) Limited | PR783500 |
| Western Health | PR783501 |
[1] B2025/1688 (PR783191).
[2] This is, in effect 10 working days from the date of the making of the Orders and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR783481>
- AGLC
- Health Services Union v Albury Wodonga Health [2025] FWC 189
- Case
- [2025] FWC 189
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues in the case involved whether the application met the requirements of section 443 of the Fair Work Act, including whether there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and whether the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employers. Additionally, the Commission had to consider the wording of the proposed ballot questions and whether they were acceptable.
The Deputy President was satisfied that all requirements of section 443 of the Act had been met, including that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employers and that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement. The Deputy President also noted that the Commission had raised concerns about the wording of some of the proposed ballot questions, but these had been addressed in amended questions proposed by the union, which had not been opposed by the employers. The Deputy President determined the date by which voting was to close in each ballot to be 6 February 2025, which also established the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. The Deputy President noted that for a multi-enterprise agreement, the minimum period of written notice for any industrial action would be 120 hours under section 414 of the Act.
The Fair Work Commission granted the application and made separate orders for each of the 19 employers, allowing for the protected action ballots to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd. The Commission also noted that another Member of the Commission would conduct the compulsory conciliation conference in relation to all matters and that directions would be issued to ensure that the parties attended the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.