5 , 93
JUDGMENT HQ. 0@100000000000130C 500000000.1.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT
O F AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRlCr OF THE
STATE O F OUEENSLAND
RE: LOIS PATSY HAYES
Bankrupt
EX PARTE: I WORRELL AS TRUSTEE OF LOIS CORAM:
DATE: 28 JUIY, 1993 -6 AUG 1993 H PLACE: Brisbane REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an appl~catlon for a declaration that a dlamond ring tendered on
the public examination of the bankrupt Lois Patsy Hayes is property of the bankrupt which vested in Ivor Worrell as trustee in bankruptcy pursuant to sectlon 58 of the Bankruptcv Act and for an order for delivery of the sald ring to the trustee.
sons to replace an engagement ring which had lost the gem. The purchase prlce of the ring was $2,000 00. The ring falls within the definition of property and property of the bankrupt wrthin the meaning of those terms as defined in sectron 5 of the Act. The ring is not an exempted category of property in section 116(2) of the Act. It is not in my view necessary wearing apparel within section 116(2)(b).
The bankrupt did not attend on the application. However an alfidavit
from her and submissions from Messrs. Wllson Rynn ant1 Grosc were sent to the
court and I have had regard to them.
Mrs. Hayes states that the ring was given to her in June, 1992 by her
Having regard to the creditors of the estate I doubt that realization of
the value of the rrng will contribute greatly to the estate. Nevertheless the trustee is w~thin his rights to bring the application to obtain an order for delivery as part of his administration of the estate, notwithstanding that the bankrupt has an emotional attachment to the ring.
I would expect that the trustee would offer the ring for sale first to the
bankrupt or her tamily at the market value achieveable by the trustee on the sale of a
second hand ring to a private purchaser or the jewellery trade.
I make the declaration sought in paragraph 1 of the application.
I direct the district registrar of the court to deliver the said ring to the
applicant trustee.
I ORDER that the costs of the applicatiori be costs in the bankruptcy.
I certifi that this and the preceding page are a true copy of the reasons for judgment herein of his Honour Mr. Justice Choper.
, v t
Date: 28 July, 1993 .! l i c ; ! , , . , ~ 111 i , 1 1 ' ( , ? ! L , Associate
- AGLC
- Hayes, Lois Patsy v Worrell, Ivor as trustee of Lois Patsy Hayes [1993] FCA 525
- Case
- [1993] FCA 525
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether the diamond ring in question is property of the bankrupt within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Act and if it vested in the trustee. The court had to determine whether the ring was exempt from vesting in the trustee under section 116(2) of the Act. The bankrupt contended that the ring was given to her by her sons in June 1992 to replace an engagement ring that had lost its gem. The ring's purchase price was $2,000. The trustee argued that the ring is property of the bankrupt and should vest in him as part of the estate administration.
The court found that the ring falls within the definition of property and property of the bankrupt as defined in section 5 of the Act. It is not an exempted category of property under section 116(2) of the Act and is not considered necessary wearing apparel within section 116(2)(b). The court acknowledged that the realization of the ring's value may not significantly contribute to the estate but allowed the trustee to proceed with the application. The court also suggested that the trustee should offer the ring for sale first to the bankrupt or her family at the market value achievable by the trustee on the sale of a second-hand ring to a private purchaser or the jewellery trade.
The court granted the declaration sought in the application and directed the district registrar of the court to deliver the ring to the applicant trustee. The court further ordered that the costs of the application be costs in the bankruptcy.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.