Haver v Director of Public Prosecutions

Case

[2013] VSC 622

1 November 2013


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Haver v Director of Public Prosecutions [2013] VSC 622 [2013] VSC 622 1 November 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Haver v Director of Public Prosecutions, the respondent sought a determination regarding bail for the applicant who had been charged with murder under section 3A of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) following an incident where a firearm was accidentally discharged resulting in the death of an accomplice. The applicant was also facing charges of intentionally and recklessly causing serious injury, with the weapon being used in the course of an assault on another individual. The matter was heard by a court which was tasked with deciding whether the applicant had demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting bail, and whether the prosecution had shown that there was an unacceptable risk of the applicant interfering with witnesses or otherwise contravening the conditions of bail.

The court examined whether the applicant had established the necessary exceptional circumstances and shown sufficient cause why detention was not justified. Factors considered included the applicant's ties to the jurisdiction, residence, employment history, and adherence to court appearances. The court also weighed the risk of the applicant interfering with witnesses or contravening the conditions of bail. In this instance, the court found that the applicant had sufficiently demonstrated ties to the community and had no history of failing to appear before the court. Furthermore, the court took into account the applicant's co-accused having been granted bail, and the delay in the proceedings.

The court ultimately concluded that the applicant had made out a case for bail on the other charges, but not on the murder charge. The court granted bail with a surety and imposed a range of conditions, including a curfew, an exclusion zone, a requirement to report thrice weekly, and a prohibition on contact with witnesses or the co-accused. The court's decision was grounded in the provisions of the Bail Act 1977 (Vic), specifically sections 4(2)(a), 4(2)(d), 4(4)(c) and 13(2). The applicant was discharged on the murder charge and granted bail on the other charges, subject to the conditions outlined by the court.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Limitation Periods

  • Bail

  • Intentional Homicide

  • Reckless Endangerment

  • Weapon Use

  • Witness Interference

  • Bail Conditions

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Wilio v The King [2023] VSCA 88

Cases Citing This Decision

8

Wilio v The King [2023] VSCA 88
Re Hamad [2020] VSC 440
Re Frank [2019] VSC 91
Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0

Armstrong v R [2013] VSC 111
Armstrong v R [2013] VSC 111