Harrison v Baring
Case
•
[2012] NSWLEC 117
•15 May 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Harrison v Baring [2012] NSWLEC 117
[2012] NSWLEC 117
15 May 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This case involved a dispute between Harrison and Baring, with the court tasked with determining the guilt of the defendant on a series of charges. The charges arose from an incident involving the alleged misuse of information and a failure to comply with certain obligations. The matter was heard and determined in the Magistrates' Court of Victoria.
The legal issues before the court included whether the defendant had indeed misused the information as alleged, and whether the defendant had failed to comply with certain obligations, as charged. The court had to consider the evidence presented by both parties, including any relevant statutory provisions and common law principles applicable to the case.
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt on all charges. The court concluded that the defendant had indeed misused the information and had failed to comply with certain obligations. The court found the defendant guilty of each of the ten offences as particularised in the summonses (50856 - 50865 of 2011) filed on 20 September 2011.
The final orders of the court reflected the findings of guilt. The defendant was found guilty of each of the ten offences as particularised in the summonses (50856 - 50865 of 2011) filed on 20 September 2011. The court did not impose any penalty or sentence at this stage, as further proceedings were required to determine the appropriate penalty or sentence for each offence.
The legal issues before the court included whether the defendant had indeed misused the information as alleged, and whether the defendant had failed to comply with certain obligations, as charged. The court had to consider the evidence presented by both parties, including any relevant statutory provisions and common law principles applicable to the case.
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt on all charges. The court concluded that the defendant had indeed misused the information and had failed to comply with certain obligations. The court found the defendant guilty of each of the ten offences as particularised in the summonses (50856 - 50865 of 2011) filed on 20 September 2011.
The final orders of the court reflected the findings of guilt. The defendant was found guilty of each of the ten offences as particularised in the summonses (50856 - 50865 of 2011) filed on 20 September 2011. The court did not impose any penalty or sentence at this stage, as further proceedings were required to determine the appropriate penalty or sentence for each offence.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Mens Rea & Intention
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Harrison v Baring [2012] NSWLEC 117
Most Recent Citation
Environment Protection Authority v Aussie Earthmovers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWLEC 98
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Environment Protection Authority v Aussie Earthmovers Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2020] NSWLEC 98
Harrison v Baring (No 2)
[2012] NSWLEC 145
Environment Protection Authority v Aussie Earthmovers Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2020] NSWLEC 98