Harris v 718932 Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2003] NSWCA 38
•3 March 2003
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Harris v 718932 Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 38
[2003] NSWCA 38
3 March 2003
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal concerned a defamation action brought by the plaintiff, Harris, against the defendant, 718932 Pty Ltd. The core of the dispute revolved around whether a prior judgment obtained by the plaintiff against a different party for the publication of the same defamatory material barred a subsequent action against the defendant for a distinct republication of that material. The matter was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the plaintiff's claim was barred by the doctrine of *res judicata* due to the prior judgment, and whether the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) s 5(1)(b) precluded a separate action for the distinct republication. The court was required to consider the nature of distinct republications of defamatory material and their relationship to successive tortfeasors.
The Court of Appeal held that a judgment obtained against one publisher of a defamatory statement does not, by reason of *res judicata*, bar a subsequent action against a different publisher for a distinct republication of the same defamatory statement. The court reasoned that each distinct publication constitutes a separate tort, causing separate damage, and therefore the prior judgment did not extinguish the plaintiff's cause of action against the defendant for the latter's independent act of publication. The court further found that the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 s 5(1)(b) did not apply to bar the action, as the defendant was not a joint or concurrent tortfeasor with the party against whom the prior judgment was obtained.
The appeal was allowed, and orders were made accordingly.
The legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the plaintiff's claim was barred by the doctrine of *res judicata* due to the prior judgment, and whether the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) s 5(1)(b) precluded a separate action for the distinct republication. The court was required to consider the nature of distinct republications of defamatory material and their relationship to successive tortfeasors.
The Court of Appeal held that a judgment obtained against one publisher of a defamatory statement does not, by reason of *res judicata*, bar a subsequent action against a different publisher for a distinct republication of the same defamatory statement. The court reasoned that each distinct publication constitutes a separate tort, causing separate damage, and therefore the prior judgment did not extinguish the plaintiff's cause of action against the defendant for the latter's independent act of publication. The court further found that the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 s 5(1)(b) did not apply to bar the action, as the defendant was not a joint or concurrent tortfeasor with the party against whom the prior judgment was obtained.
The appeal was allowed, and orders were made accordingly.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Res Judicata
-
Appeal
-
Limitation Periods
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Harris v 718932 Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 38
Most Recent Citation
Diamond v Birdon Contracting Pty Limited [2008] NSWLEC 302
Cases Citing This Decision
259
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Cummings
[2012] ACTCA 36
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Cummings
[2012] ACTCA 36
Young v Racing NSW
[2021] NSWCA 241
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
4
State Bank of New South Wales Ltd v Currabubula Holdings Pty Ltd
[2001] NSWCA 47
State Bank of New South Wales Ltd v Currabubula Holdings Pty Ltd
[2001] NSWCA 47
Liosatos v Australian National Line
[1964] HCA 43