[2016] FWCA 2189
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| Harris HMC Interiors Pty Ltd |
| (AG2016/2558) |
HARRIS HMC INTERIORS PTY LTD MAINTENANCE ENTERPRISE
AGREEMENT 2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries
| COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 7 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of the Harris HMC Interiors Pty Ltd Maintenance Enterprise
Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Harris HMC Interiors Pty Ltd Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The
application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made
by Harris HMC Interiors Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is
attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment
to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in
substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the
requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for
approval have been met.
[2016] FWCA 2189
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from
14 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 6 April 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE418503 PR578810>
[2016] FWCA 2189
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Harris HMC Interiors Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 2189
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2189
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining whether the enterprise agreement met the criteria set out in sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court had to consider if the agreement complied with the relevant requirements and if the undertakings provided by the applicant would not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the agreement. The court was also required to ensure that the agreement would not result in substantial changes. The court found that the agreement met all the necessary requirements.
The court's reasoning was that the agreement met all the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act 2009, and the written undertakings provided by the applicant were satisfactory. The court was satisfied that the agreement would not cause financial detriment to any employee and would not result in substantial changes. Therefore, the court approved the agreement and determined that it would operate from 14 April 2016, with a nominal expiry date of 6 April 2020. The court's decision was based on the applicant's compliance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.