HARRIS & HARRIS

Case

[2012] FamCA 987

22 November 2012


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
HARRIS & HARRIS [2012] FamCA 987 [2012] FamCA 987 22 November 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Harris & Harris*, Murphy J of the Family Court of Australia was required to consider an application for consent orders. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, beyond the fact that it was brought before the Family Court, is not detailed in the provided text.

The primary legal issue before the court was the determination and formalisation of consent orders as presented by the parties. This involved the court's consideration of the "Minutes of Consent" document, which contained the agreed terms, declarations, and notations to be made.

Murphy J, by consent of the parties, made orders pursuant to Rule 10.17(a) of the *Family Law Rules 2004*. These orders were to be in terms of the agreed "Minutes of Consent" document, which was sealed and attached to the court's orders. The court further ordered the dismissal of all outstanding applications, the removal of the proceedings from the list of cases awaiting finalisation, and the return of all subpoenaed documents and exhibits to their original custodians.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Consent

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Remedies

  • Stay of Proceedings

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

12

Sheridan & Sheridan [2021] FamCA 274
Koyroyshs and Koyroyshs [2018] FamCA 840
HILLMAN & CARSON [2018] FamCA 477
Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

1

Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52