Harjai v Fraser

In *Harjai v Fraser*, the appellant sought an interlocutory injunction to restrain the respondent from taking certain actions pending the determination of an appeal. The specific nature of the dispute and the actions sought to be restrained are not detailed in the provided text. The matter came before Beazley P.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the appellant had established a sufficient case for the grant of an interlocutory injunction, particularly in light of the limited prospects of success on appeal. This involved considering the established principles for granting such relief, including the likelihood of success and the balance of convenience.

Beazley P determined that the appellant had not demonstrated a sufficient likelihood of success on appeal to warrant the grant of an interlocutory injunction. The court applied the principles governing interlocutory injunctions, which require a strong case to be made out, especially when the injunction would have a significant impact on the respondent. The limited prospects of success weighed heavily against the grant of the relief sought.

Consequently, the notice of motion seeking the interlocutory injunction was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.