Harford and Harford and Anor
Case
•
[2018] FCCA 3267
•12 November 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Harford and Harford and Anor [2018] FCCA 3267
[2018] FCCA 3267
12 November 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Harford and Harford and Anor*, the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered its jurisdiction in a family law matter. The specific dispute involved the parties' claims and the court's power to hear and determine them.
The central legal issue before the court was whether it possessed accrued jurisdiction to deal with the claims presented by the parties, and if so, whether it was appropriate to exercise that jurisdiction.
Judge Costigan found that the Federal Circuit Court was sufficiently vested with accrued jurisdiction. The court reasoned that it was appropriate to exercise this jurisdiction to hear and determine the claims. Consequently, the court ordered that the matter be listed for a directions hearing in the Federal Circuit Court sittings at Coffs Harbour on 27 November 2018.
The central legal issue before the court was whether it possessed accrued jurisdiction to deal with the claims presented by the parties, and if so, whether it was appropriate to exercise that jurisdiction.
Judge Costigan found that the Federal Circuit Court was sufficiently vested with accrued jurisdiction. The court reasoned that it was appropriate to exercise this jurisdiction to hear and determine the claims. Consequently, the court ordered that the matter be listed for a directions hearing in the Federal Circuit Court sittings at Coffs Harbour on 27 November 2018.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Jepson & Jepson (No 8) [2025] FedCFamC1F 146
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
4
City of Swan v McGraw-Hill Companies Inc
[2014] FCA 442
Cole v Whitfield
[1988] HCA 18
Valceski v Valceski
[2007] NSWSC 440