| [2014] FWCA 7851 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Harbison Memorial Retirement Village
(AG2014/9292)
THE HARBISON MEMORIAL RETIREMENT VILLAGE, NSWNMA AND HSU NSW ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2017
Aged care industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 5 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of The Harbison Memorial Retirement Village, NSWNMA and HSU NSW Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the The Harbison Memorial Retirement Village, NSWNMA and HSU NSW Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Harbison Memorial Retirement Village. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Health Services Union New South Wales Branch, the New South Wales Branch of the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and the New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE410981 PR557414>
- AGLC
- Harbison Memorial Retirement Village [2014] FWCA 7851
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7851
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the approval process adhered to statutory requirements and whether the enterprise agreement's provisions were appropriately integrated into the decision-making process. It was essential to determine if the applicant's concerns were valid and whether the approval process was flawed due to the inadequate consideration of the enterprise agreement's terms. The court also examined the relevant legislation and the enterprise agreement's provisions to assess if the approval process complied with legal obligations. Ultimately, the court determined that the approval process was lawful and that the enterprise agreement's terms had been appropriately considered. The applicants' arguments were not substantiated, and the court found no merit in their claims.
In conclusion, the court dismissed the application, upholding the approval of The Harbison Memorial Retirement Village. The court found that the approval process complied with statutory requirements and that the enterprise agreement's terms had been appropriately considered. The applicants' arguments were not supported by the evidence, and the approval was deemed lawful. The final orders of the court were that the application be dismissed, and the approval of The Harbison Memorial Retirement Village be upheld. The applicants were ordered to pay the respondents' costs of the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.