HARAGLI & PASUT AND ANOR
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 518
•19 June 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
HARAGLI & PASUT AND ANOR [2018] FamCA 518
[2018] FamCA 518
19 June 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Haragli & Pasut and Anor*, the applicant father sought sole parental responsibility and orders for the child X, born in 2014, to live with him. The respondents were the child's mother and another party.
The central legal issue before Bennett J was to determine the parenting arrangements for the child X, specifically whether sole parental responsibility should be granted to the father and whether the child should live with him, considering the best interests of the child.
The court's decision was informed by a Family Report dated 12 June 2018. Based on the evidence and the report, the court ordered that the father have sole parental responsibility for the child X and that the child live with the father. The court also directed that copies of the orders, reasons for decision, and the Family Report be served on the respondents by international express post. All other extant applications were dismissed, and the appointment of the Independent Children’s Lawyer was discharged. The court further included a Fact Sheet detailing the particulars of the orders, the consequences of contravention, and sources of assistance, pursuant to Sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation.
The central legal issue before Bennett J was to determine the parenting arrangements for the child X, specifically whether sole parental responsibility should be granted to the father and whether the child should live with him, considering the best interests of the child.
The court's decision was informed by a Family Report dated 12 June 2018. Based on the evidence and the report, the court ordered that the father have sole parental responsibility for the child X and that the child live with the father. The court also directed that copies of the orders, reasons for decision, and the Family Report be served on the respondents by international express post. All other extant applications were dismissed, and the appointment of the Independent Children’s Lawyer was discharged. The court further included a Fact Sheet detailing the particulars of the orders, the consequences of contravention, and sources of assistance, pursuant to Sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0