[2013] FWCA 9519 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
CORRECTION TO DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Hanson Constructions Materials Pty Ltd
(AG2013/10192)
HANSON CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PTY LTD CENTRAL COAST SANDS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Quarrying industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 5 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd Central Coast Sands Enterprise Agreement 2013.
This decision wholly replaces [2013] FWCA 9519 PR545298 issued by me on 4 December 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd Central Coast Sands Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU), being a bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and will operate from 11 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 October 2017.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE405690 PR545356>
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code {?}, AE405690 PR545356>
- AGLC
- Hanson Constructions Materials Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 9519
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9519
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the Fair Work Commission did possess the authority to correct its prior decisions in certain circumstances. The court examined the statutory framework governing the Commission's powers and concluded that the Commission had the discretion to make amendments to its decisions where there had been a material error or where it was necessary to clarify the law. The court further determined that the Commission's decision to correct its prior ruling was justified and did not exceed its statutory powers. The court held that the Commission had acted within its jurisdiction and had appropriately exercised its discretion in making the correction.
As a result of the court's decision, the correction made by the Fair Work Commission was upheld. The court confirmed that the Commission's actions were lawful and that the correction to the earlier decision was valid. The final orders of the court affirmed the Commission's decision to correct its prior ruling, emphasising the importance of the Commission's ability to rectify errors and clarify its decisions to ensure clarity and consistency in the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.