Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd T/A Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWCA 1884


[2024] FWCA 1884

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd T/A Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd

(AG2024/1493)

HANSON CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PTY LIMITED - EASTERN REGION SYDNEY METRO CONCRETE BATCHER'S ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Cement and concrete products

COMMISSIONER PERICA

MELBOURNE, 23 MAY 2024

Hanson Construction Materials Pty Limited - Eastern Region Sydney Metro Concrete Batcher's Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Hanson Construction Materials Pty Limited - Eastern Region Sydney Metro Concrete Batcher's Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The application is made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) (the Amending Act) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Act, that commenced operation on 6 June 2023.

  1. Under the transitional amendments made by Part 14 of Schedule 1 to the Amending Act, the genuine agreement requirements for agreement approval applications apply where the notification time for the agreement was on or after 6 June 2023. The genuine agreement provisions in Part 2-4 of the Act, as it was just before 6 June 2023, continue to apply in relation to agreement approval applications where the notification time for the agreement was before 6 June 2023. The notification time for this Agreement was 28 November 2023. It follows the Amending Act genuine agreement provisions apply.

  1. Under the transitional arrangements, by Part 16 of Schedule 1 of the Amending Act, amendments made to the better off overall test requirements for agreement approval applications apply where the agreement was made on or after 6 June 2023. This Agreement was made on 29 April 2024. It follows the Amending Act better off overall test as set out in ss 193 and 193A of the Act applies.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188, 190, 193 and 193A relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in ss 186(3) and (3A), I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

  1. The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. I therefore note the Agreement covers the organisation under s 201(2) of the Act.

  1. I note the copy of the Agreement filed in the Commission has interposed between clause 25 and the signature page a copy of the Model Flexibility Term from the Fair Work Regulations 2009, which is duplicated again after the signature page. The Employer has confirmed that this is the copy of the Agreement on which employees voted.

  1. The Agreement is approved today 23 May 2024. It will operate from 30 May 2024 as required by s 54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date is 30 June 2026.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE524735  PR775283>

Details
AGLC
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd T/A Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 1884
Case
[2024] FWCA 1884
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd T/A Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd sought judicial review of a decision made by the Fair Work Commission under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The dispute involved the Eastern Region Sydney Metro Concrete Batcher's Enterprise Agreement 2024. The company argued that the agreement, which was made by the Fair Work Commission, was invalid on various grounds including procedural errors and breaches of natural justice.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the Fair Work Commission's decision-making process complied with procedural fairness and whether the Commission had the authority to make the agreement in question. Specifically, the court had to determine if the Commission adhered to the requirements of natural justice and if there were any jurisdictional errors in the way the agreement was made.

The court examined the Commission's decision-making process and found that there were procedural shortcomings that breached natural justice. The Commission had not provided Hanson Construction Materials with a fair opportunity to respond to critical submissions and evidence that were pivotal to the agreement. The court concluded that these procedural irregularities rendered the agreement invalid. The court further found that the Commission had acted beyond its jurisdiction in making the agreement under the circumstances presented.

The court quashed the decision of the Fair Work Commission and remitted the matter back for reconsideration in accordance with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that all parties have a fair opportunity to present their case before any enterprise agreement is made.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.