Hampton and Farley and Ors (No 3)

Case

[2013] FamCA 890

13 September 2013


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Hampton and Farley and Ors (No 3) [2013] FamCA 890 [2013] FamCA 890 13 September 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Hampton and Farley and Ors (No 3)*, Le Poer Trench J of the Supreme Court of New South Wales considered an application concerning the costs of litigation. The dispute involved a wife, a second respondent, and a third respondent, with the wife seeking to recover certain expenses.

The primary legal issue before the court was the extent to which the wife should be ordered to pay the reasonable expenses incurred by the second respondent in relation to Ms T Farley's attendance at court in Sydney for cross-examination. The court also had to determine the costs applications of the wife, the second respondent, and the third respondent more broadly.

Le Poer Trench J reasoned that the wife should bear the reasonable expenses of Ms Farley's attendance for cross-examination, provided these expenses could be substantiated by receipts or similar documentation demonstrating actual costs incurred. The court further ordered that the cost applications of the wife, the second respondent, and the third respondent were otherwise dismissed.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Family Law

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Discovery

  • Jurisdiction

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

3

Spurling & Ors and Spurling [2019] FamCA 802
Reza and Sadir & Anor [2019] FamCA 404
Cases Cited

29

Statutory Material Cited

0

Penfold v Penfold [1980] HCA 4
Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17
Mallet v Mallet [1984] HCA 21