HAMMOND & HAMMOND (DISQUALIFICATION)

The matter of *Hammond & Hammond (Disqualification)* concerned an application before Hannam J in the Family Court of Australia. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, beyond the context of family law proceedings involving a child, is not detailed in the provided text. However, the orders indicate a dispute concerning the release of a Family Report, access to documents produced on subpoenas, and interim arrangements for the child's residence.

The court was required to determine several issues, including whether the Family Report prepared by Ms F should be released to the parties. Additionally, the court considered the scope of access to documents obtained via subpoenas, specifically whether legal representatives should have photocopy access. The court also had to decide on the disposition of an Application in a Case filed on 4 December 2013 and address an oral application made by the father.

Hannam J's reasoning and the legal principles applied are not fully elaborated in the provided text. However, the orders suggest the court considered the welfare of the child in making interim parenting arrangements. The discharge of the interim order for the child to live with the mother and the substitution of an order for the child to live with the father indicates a shift in the court's assessment of the child's best interests for the immediate period.

The court made several orders. The Family Report was released to the parties. Orders for access to subpoenaed documents were to include photocopy access for legal representatives. The Application in a Case filed on 4 December 2013 was dismissed. The father's oral application was adjourned for the delivery of reasons for judgment. Finally, the interim order regarding the child's residence was discharged, and the child was to be collected by the father and reside with him.