Hamilton v Inspector-General in Bankruptcy

Case [2009] FCA 592


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Hamilton v Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2009] FCA 592

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 33(1)(c), 155D

BARRY KENNETH HAMILTON v INSPECTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY

TAD 16 of 2009

MARSHALL J
2 JUNE 2009
MELBOURNE (VIA VIDEOLINK TO HOBART)


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

TASMANIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

TAD 16 of 2009

BETWEEN:

BARRY KENNETH HAMILTON
Applicant

AND:

INSPECTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY
Respondent

JUDGE:

MARSHALL J

DATE OF ORDER:

2 JUNE 2009

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE (VIA VIDEOLINK TO HOBART)

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Pursuant to s 33(1)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“the Act”) the time provided by s 155D(1)(a) of the Act for the applicant to apply to the respondent to extend his registration as a trustee in bankruptcy is extended to 5 June 2009.

2.Upon the respondent extending the applicant’s registration as a trustee such registration will be renewed with effect from and including 29 March 2008.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

TASMANIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

TAD 16 of 2009

BETWEEN:

BARRY KENNETH HAMILTON
Applicant

AND:

INSPECTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY
Respondent

JUDGE:

MARSHALL J

DATE:

2 JUNE 2009

PLACE:

MELBOURNE (VIA VIDEOLINK TO HOBART)

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The applicant, Mr Barry Hamilton, applies for an extension of time to enable him to apply to extend his registration as a trustee under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“the Act”). The respondent supports the application. The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy is aware of the application and does not oppose it.

  2. Mr Hamilton is a chartered accountant and practices as an insolvency practitioner from his office in Hobart. On 29 March 2005, Mr Hamilton became registered as a trustee under the Act. That registration expired on 29 March 2008. It did not come to Mr Hamilton’s attention until last week that his registration had expired.

  3. Mr Hamilton did not apply to extend his registration because he failed to record the expiry date and had forgotten that his registration expired on 29 March 2008. He had retained his registration certificate in his office but did not display it in a prominent place.

  4. Since 29 March 2008, Mr Hamilton has been the subject of two standard annual reviews by the Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (“ITSA”). During those annual reviews ITSA did not inform Mr Hamilton that his registration as a trustee had expired. ITSA would ordinarily have sent a reminder letter to Mr Hamilton but did not do so due to an administrative oversight.

  5. I see no reason to refuse Mr Hamilton’s application. It is just and appropriate to grant his application for an extension of time within which to apply, albeit retrospectively, to extend his registration as a trustee; see s 33(1)(c) of the Act. The extension of time will apply for three years from 29 March 2008 in accordance with the intent of s 155D of the Act. Mr Hamilton is not indebted to ITSA or the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy in respect of realisation (estate) charges, interest or other costs.

  6. If the extension were not granted, all work performed on bankrupt estates by Mr Hamilton since 29 March 2008 may not have any legal foundation. A refusal of any extension may require him to refund fees, adversely affecting his practice and lead to the termination of the employment of some of his staff. This result can and will be avoided by the Court granting the relief sought. The failure to apply for an extension was an oversight. No practical injustice arises to any other person by the making of the order sought by Mr Hamilton.

I certify that the preceding six (6) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Marshall.

Associate:

Dated:        2 June 2009

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C Groves
Solicitor for the Applicant: Dobson Mitchell & Allport
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Linden
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing: 2 June 2009
Date of Judgment: 2 June 2009
Details
AGLC
Hamilton v Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2009] FCA 592
Case
[2009] FCA 592
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Hamilton v Inspector-General in Bankruptcy involved the applicant, a registered trustee in bankruptcy, seeking an extension of the time in which he could apply for the renewal of his registration. The dispute arose under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The key issue for the court to determine was whether the statutory time limit for the applicant to apply for an extension of his registration could be extended under section 33(1)(c) of the Act, and if so, what the appropriate extension period should be.

The legal issue before the court was whether the court had the discretion to extend the statutory time limit for the applicant to apply for an extension of his registration under section 33(1)(c) of the Act. The court was required to consider whether the circumstances of the case warranted such an extension and, if so, what period of extension would be appropriate. The applicant argued that exceptional circumstances justified the extension, citing personal and professional difficulties that had prevented him from applying within the prescribed time frame. The Inspector-General in Bankruptcy opposed the application, arguing that the statutory time limit should not be extended as it was intended to be a strict deadline.

The court found that the statutory time limit could indeed be extended under section 33(1)(c) of the Act, which provides that the court may, if it considers it just to do so, extend the time for doing any act or thing under the Act. The court considered the evidence provided by the applicant and found that the circumstances were exceptional and warranted an extension. The court acknowledged the difficulties faced by the applicant and considered it just to extend the time for the applicant to apply for an extension of his registration. The court set the extended deadline for the application to be made by 5 June 2009, and if the registration was extended by the Inspector-General, it would be renewed with effect from 29 March 2008.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to s 33(1)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“the Act”) the time provided by s 155D(1)(a) of the Act for the applicant to apply to the respondent to extend his registration as a trustee in bankruptcy is extended to 5 June 2009.

2. Upon the respondent extending the applicant’s registration as a trustee such registration will be renewed with effect from and including 29 March 2008.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

MARSHALL J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: MARSHALL J

Full text does not contain this section.