Haight and Balog
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1192
•10 July 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Haight and Balog [2017] FCCA 1192
[2017] FCCA 1192
10 July 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The application before Judge Jones concerned an alteration of property interests under section 90SM of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The parties involved were Haight and Balog.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant, Haight, had established the necessary conditions to warrant an alteration of property interests as between the parties.
Judge Jones dismissed the application, finding that the threshold requirements for an alteration of property interests under section 90SM of the *Family Law Act 1975* were not met. The court's reasoning, as reflected in the orders, indicates a failure by the applicant to demonstrate grounds for intervention in the existing property arrangements.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant, Haight, had established the necessary conditions to warrant an alteration of property interests as between the parties.
Judge Jones dismissed the application, finding that the threshold requirements for an alteration of property interests under section 90SM of the *Family Law Act 1975* were not met. The court's reasoning, as reflected in the orders, indicates a failure by the applicant to demonstrate grounds for intervention in the existing property arrangements.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Haight and Balog [2017] FCCA 1192
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
2
Singer v Berghouse
[1994] HCA 40
Singer v Berghouse
[1994] HCA 40
Bevan & Bevan
[2013] FamCAFC 116