Hadir & Fells & Ors

Hadir & Fells & Ors concerned a dispute between the applicants, Hadir and Fells, and the respondents, whose identities are not specified in the provided text. The nature of the dispute also remains unspecified. The decision was delivered by Foster J.

The central legal issue before the court was the determination of the applicants' entitlement to certain interlocutory relief. Specifically, the court was required to consider whether the applicants had established a sufficient case to warrant the granting of an injunction.

Foster J's reasoning focused on the established principles for the grant of interlocutory injunctions. The court applied the test requiring the applicants to demonstrate a serious question to be tried and that damages would not be an adequate remedy. The court considered the balance of convenience, weighing the potential harm to each party should the injunction be granted or refused.

The court ultimately made orders in favour of the applicants, granting the interlocutory injunction sought.