Hadgelias Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Ray White Paddington

Case [2014] FWCA 883


[2014] FWCA 883

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Hadgelias Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Ray White Paddington
(AG2014/114)

RAY WHITE PADDINGTON ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Real estate industry

COMMISSIONER BULL

SYDNEY, 5 FEBRUARY 2014

Application for approval of the Ray White Paddington Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Ray White Paddington Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) the Agreement will operate from 12 February 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of operation.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE406722  PR547474>

Details
AGLC
Hadgelias Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Ray White Paddington [2014] FWCA 883
Case
[2014] FWCA 883
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent case, Hadgelias Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Ray White Paddington applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the Ray White Paddington Enterprise Agreement 2014. The agreement was entered into between the company and the Real Estate Institute of New South Wales (REINSW), representing the employees. The primary dispute centred on the terms and conditions of employment as outlined in the proposed agreement. The Commission was required to determine whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issues before the Commission involved the compliance of the agreement with the statutory provisions outlined in the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for the terms and conditions of employment in a manner that was fair and reasonable, taking into account the principles of the safety net, the role of enterprise bargaining, and the preservation of the right to free collective bargaining. Additionally, the Commission needed to ensure that the agreement did not contravene any minimum standards prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations.

In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the proposed agreement in detail, considering submissions from both parties. The Commission found that the agreement was fair and reasonable, as it provided for a comprehensive set of terms and conditions that balanced the interests of both employers and employees. The agreement included provisions for minimum wages, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms, all of which were consistent with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the legal requirements for approval and did not contravene any minimum standards.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Ray White Paddington Enterprise Agreement 2014, determining that it was fair and reasonable and met all the necessary legal requirements. The agreement was approved effective from the date of the decision, providing a binding framework for the employment relationship between Hadgelias Holdings Pty Ltd and the employees represented by REINSW.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.