HABER & AHCRAFT

The proceeding involved applications brought by Haber and Ahcraft. The nature of the dispute and the specific relief sought are not detailed in the provided text. The decision was made by Cronin J.

The primary legal issue before the court was the procedural management of the applications. Cronin J was required to determine how best to advance the matter towards a final hearing.

Cronin J's reasoning focused on the efficient progression of the case. The court ordered that all existing applications be referred to the Co-ordinating Registrar. This referral was for the purpose of scheduling the matter for procedural orders before a trial judge and subsequently fixing a date for a final hearing. The court also directed that its reasons for judgment be brought to the attention of the Co-ordinating Registrar, indicating the importance of these reasons for the future conduct of the proceedings.