H Y Koo and Associates v Northern Beaches Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1480


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: H Y Koo & Associates v Northern Beaches Council [2018] NSWLEC 1480
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 7 September 2018
Date of orders: 07 September 2018
Decision date: 07 September 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: H Y Koo & Associates (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
P Tomasetti (Applicant)

Solicitors:
Ristevski & Associates (Applicant)
E Roberts, Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/222061
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: Pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 the parties having reached an agreement acceptable to them (being a decision that the Commissioner is satisfied that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions) the Court disposes of the proceedings in accordance with the decision of the parties titled "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT ACT 1979 S34(3)(a)" ("the decision") between H Y Koo & Associates as applicant and Northern Beaches Council as respondent and signed by the parties' legal representatives on 5 and 6 September 2018.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld;

  2. Development consent DA2017/1127 that relates to the land at Lot 88 DP 752017 at 88 Eurabba Road, Duffys Forest is modified pursuant to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 so as to:

  1. Delete condition 12 (Bushland Covenant) therefrom; and

  2. Insert condition 47 (Bushland Protection) as set out in annexure "A" to the decision therein.

……………………….

Michael Chilcott

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (347 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
H Y Koo and Associates v Northern Beaches Council [2018] NSWLEC 1480
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1480
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of H Y Koo and Associates v Northern Beaches Council, the plaintiff, a company engaged in the business of providing property management services, sought a declaration that the defendant, the Northern Beaches Council, had breached the contract of employment by terminating the plaintiff's employment without just cause or reason. The case was heard and determined by the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Northern Beaches Council had lawfully exercised its discretion to terminate the plaintiff's employment and, if so, whether the termination was justified. The court had to consider the terms of the employment contract, the applicable statutory provisions, and the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.

The court examined the terms of the contract and found that the Northern Beaches Council had the discretion to terminate the contract under certain circumstances. However, the court held that the council's decision to terminate the contract was not in accordance with the requirements of natural justice and procedural fairness. The court found that the council had failed to provide the plaintiff with an adequate opportunity to respond to the allegations against it and had not considered all relevant evidence before making its decision. The court further found that the council's decision to terminate the contract was not supported by the evidence and was therefore unlawful. As a result, the court granted the plaintiff's application for a declaration that the termination of the contract was unlawful.

The court ordered that the Northern Beaches Council pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceeding.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.