| [2021] FWCA 3542 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Gypsum Resources Australia Pty Limited
(AG2021/5572)
GYPSUM RESOURCES AUSTRALIA WORKPLACE AGREEMENT 2021
Mining industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE | SYDNEY, 18 JUNE 2021 |
Application for approval of the Gypsum Resources Australia Workplace Agreement 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the Gypsum Resources Australia Workplace Agreement 2021 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Gypsum Resources Australia Pty Limited (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The following employee organisation (which was a bargaining representative for the Agreement), has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want to be covered by the Agreement:
The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU).
[3] In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[5] I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 June 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE511902 PR730871>
- AGLC
- Gypsum Resources Australia Pty Limited [2021] FWCA 3542
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 3542
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues addressed by the Commission included whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, whether it complied with the minimum entitlements stipulated by the Fair Work Act, and if it adhered to the prescribed process for making an enterprise agreement. The Commission examined the content of the agreement, including provisions related to wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions. The applicant argued that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and represented a fair and reasonable set of terms and conditions for the employees.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement contained terms that did not meet the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the agreement failed to provide for minimum rates of pay, annual leave, and other entitlements as prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations. Additionally, the process by which the agreement was negotiated did not comply with the mandatory requirements for making an enterprise agreement. As a result, the Commission refused to approve the agreement. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring that all terms of an enterprise agreement comply with the legislative framework governing workplace relations in Australia.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.