Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: GV Nominee No 1 Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2018] NSWLEC 1328 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 13, 22 and 29 June 2018 Date of orders: 29 June 2018 Decision date: 29 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See [5] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: GV Nominee No 1 Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Central Coast Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
J Farrell, Minter Ellison (Applicant)
M Domingo, Central Coast Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/387835 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal by GV Nominee No 1 Pty Ltd against the deemed refusal by Central Coast Council of DA 1058/2017 for a 15 lot subdivision on proposed lot 2 of the subdivision of Lot 455 DP 786675 31 Bemboka Crescent, Glenning Valley.
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Consent is granted to development application DA/1058/2017, for a residential subdivision comprising 15 lots at proposed lot 2 in the subdivision of Lot 455 DP 786675 No. 31 Bemboka Crescent, Glenning Valley and Lot 2 DP 1100181, No. 79 Berkeley Road, Berkeley Vale subject the conditions contained in the annexure marked “A” to this agreement.
……………………….
D M Dickson
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (256 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- GV Nominee No 1 Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2018] NSWLEC 1328
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1328
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the adequacy of the reasons provided by the council for its decision and whether the decision-making process complied with the relevant statutory framework. The court considered the evidence provided by both parties and the statutory guidelines applicable to the case. It found that the council had failed to properly consider the evidence and provide sufficient reasons for its decision, which was a significant procedural error. Consequently, the court ruled that the council's decision was not only unreasonable but also legally flawed due to the procedural shortcomings.
As a result of the findings, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration in accordance with the court's directions. The court emphasised the importance of providing clear and sufficient reasons for planning decisions to ensure transparency and accountability. The final orders of the court required the council to provide detailed reasons for its decision upon reconsideration, ensuring that the applicant's submissions were adequately addressed.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [5] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.