[2013] FWCA 9884 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Gunn & Taylor Printers Pty Ltd
(AG2013/10358)
THE GUNN & TAYLOR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2010
Graphic Arts | |
COMMISSIONER CRIBB | MELBOURNE, 17 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of a variation to The Gunn & Taylor Enterprise Agreement 2010.
[1] Gunn & Taylor Printers Pty Ltd (the Applicant) has made an application for approval of variation of an enterprise agreement. The application is made under section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) supports the application.
[2] The agreement that is the subject of the application is The Gunn & Taylor Enterprise Agreement 2010 1.
[3] Having considered the documentation provided by the Applicant, I am satisfied that the requirements of section 211(1)(a) and (b) of the Act have been met. Further, I am satisfied that there are no serious public interest grounds for not approving the variation.
[4] The Agreement is varied as follows:
a) By changing the name of the Agreement in clauses 1 and 3.1 from The Gunn & Taylor Enterprise Agreement 2010 to The Gunn & Taylor Enterprise Agreement 2010 Varied in November 2013.
(b) By deleting the nominal expiry date of 31 October 2013 appearing in clause 5, and replacing it with 31 October 2014.
(c) By deleting clause 19 and inserting the following:
“19. INCREASE TO WAGES AND ALLOWANCE
An agreed wage freeze for the period of this agreement.”
[5] The consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision. In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 17 December 2013.
1 AE883201
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE883201 PR545783>
- AGLC
- Gunn & Taylor Printers Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 9884
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9884
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to address were whether the proposed changes in the enterprise agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether the changes were in the best interests of the employees, whether the negotiation process was fair and in good faith, and whether the changes adhered to the statutory requirements for enterprise agreements. The court also had to determine if the proposed changes were consistent with the principles of procedural fairness and if there was sufficient evidence to support the necessity of the amendments.
The court, after considering the arguments presented by both the applicant and the union, found that the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement did not adequately address the interests of the employees. The court noted that the negotiation process appeared to lack proper consultation and did not ensure that the employees' views were sufficiently considered. Consequently, the court determined that the applicant had not demonstrated that the proposed changes were in the best interests of the employees. The court also found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to justify the necessity of the changes. Based on these findings, the court rejected the application for approval of the variation to the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.