Guma ICRG JV Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 1044


[2014] FWCA 1044

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Guma ICRG JV Pty Ltd
(AG2013/10297)

GUMA ICRG JV PTY LTD BASE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 12 FEBRUARY 2014

Application for approval of the Guma ICRG JV Pty Ltd Base Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Guma ICRG JV Pty Ltd Base Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Guma ICRG JV Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5]
The Agreement was approved on 12 February 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 19 February 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 February 2018.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE406842  PR547679>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Guma ICRG JV Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1044
Case
[2014] FWCA 1044
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved Guma ICRG JV Pty Ltd, an applicant seeking approval of a Base Enterprise Agreement. This enterprise agreement was proposed to govern the employment terms and conditions for a group of employees. The primary nature of the dispute was whether the agreement met the requirements set by the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically regarding the provisions, coverage, and fairness of the agreement. The matter was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which has jurisdiction over matters relating to workplace relations and employment agreements.

The legal issues that the court had to address included the compliance of the proposed agreement with the statutory framework, whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms, and whether it adequately covered the intended employees. The court also needed to assess if the agreement met the necessary procedural requirements, including the provision of a copy of the agreement to the relevant employees and any necessary bargaining representatives. The central concern was whether the agreement was genuinely bargained for and whether it offered fair and reasonable terms for the employees involved.

In its reasoning, the Fair Work Commission determined that the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements and provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The court examined the contents of the agreement and found that it was comprehensive and covered all necessary terms as required by the Fair Work Act. The Commission also concluded that the agreement was genuinely bargained for, as evidenced by the involvement of both the employer and the employees in the negotiation process. The court approved the agreement, finding that it met all necessary legal criteria and provided for fair and reasonable terms for the employees.

The final orders of the Fair Work Commission were that the Guma ICRG JV Pty Ltd Base Enterprise Agreement 2013 be approved and registered under the Fair Work Act 2009. This approval ensures that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable, providing a clear framework for the employment terms and conditions of the employees involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.