| [2014] FWCA 7856 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Gulgong Hostel Association Incorporated
(AG2014/9255)
WENONAH, NSWNMA AND HSU NSW ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2017
Aged care industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 5 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Wenonah, NSWNMA and HSU NSW Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Wenonah, NSWNMA and HSU NSW Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Gulgong Hostel Association Incorporated. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Health Services Union New South Wales Branch, the New South Wales Branch of the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and the New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE410985 PR557419>
- AGLC
- Gulgong Hostel Association Incorporated [2014] FWCA 7856
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7856
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the commission were whether certain provisions of the enterprise agreement applied to specific employees of the Gulgong Hostel Association and how these provisions should be interpreted in light of the association's specific operational context. The dispute also involved whether the association had validly exercised its right to vary the terms of the agreement in certain circumstances.
The Fair Work Commission undertook a detailed analysis of the enterprise agreement, considering the specific language used and the context in which it was negotiated. The commission found that certain provisions did apply to the employees in question and clarified the scope and interpretation of these provisions. It was determined that the association had not validly exercised its right to vary the terms of the agreement, as it had not followed the necessary procedural requirements. The commission issued detailed orders to ensure compliance with the agreement and provided guidance on the correct interpretation of the relevant provisions.
As a result of the commission's decision, the Gulgong Hostel Association was required to comply with the terms of the enterprise agreement as interpreted by the commission. The employees were entitled to the benefits and protections outlined in the agreement, and the association was directed to cease any actions that contravened the agreement. The commission's decision provided clarity and certainty for both the employer and the employees, ensuring that the terms of the enterprise agreement were applied fairly and consistently.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.