Grujevski v Ejm Pty Ltd

Grujevski appealed against a decision of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) that dismissed his claim against Ejm Pty Ltd for payment of accounts and set-off for work done on a building project. The NCAT found that the subcontractor, Grujevski, had not proven his claim for set-off against the builder, Ejm Pty Ltd, which had engaged him to work on a building project. The legal issues before the court were whether there were grounds to grant leave to appeal the NCAT's decision. The court found that there were no grounds to grant leave to appeal, as the appeal did not disclose any error of law or injustice in the NCAT's decision. The court held that the NCAT had correctly found that the subcontractor had not proven his claim for set-off against the builder. The court also held that the appeal did not disclose any error of law or injustice in the NCAT's decision. The appeal was dismissed, and leave to appeal was refused.