Groft & Anor and Dominique and & Anor

In the matter of *Groft & Anor and Dominique & Anor*, Justice Gill of the Federal Court of Australia considered an application and a response seeking interim or procedural orders. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between the parties, the Applicants and the Respondents, is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the fact that it led to these interlocutory applications.

The central legal issues before the Court were whether to grant the interim or procedural orders sought by the Applicants in their application filed on 8 August 2016, and conversely, whether to grant the interim or procedural orders sought by the Respondents in their response filed on 16 September 2016. The Court was required to assess the merits of each party's request for interlocutory relief.

Justice Gill dismissed both the Applicants' application and the Respondents' response seeking interim or procedural orders. The reasoning behind this dismissal is not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that neither party satisfied the threshold required for the Court to grant the interlocutory relief they sought at that stage of proceedings. The Court's final orders reflected this dual dismissal.