Gregg and Gregg and Ors
Case
•
[2019] FamCA 927
•5 December 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Gregg and Gregg and Ors [2019] FamCA 927
[2019] FamCA 927
5 December 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Gregg and Gregg and Ors*, heard by Tree J, the husband sought to bring an application in a case, while the second to ninth respondents also filed their own application in the case. The precise nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but it involved applications made within existing court proceedings.
The central legal issues before the court were whether to grant the husband's application and the applications made by the second to ninth respondents. The court was also required to consider whether to impose a pleadings regime, and if so, the timeframe for making such an application.
Tree J dismissed both the husband's application and the applications made by the second to ninth respondents. The court further ordered that any party wishing to apply for the imposition of a pleadings regime must do so within twenty-eight days of the date of the orders.
The central legal issues before the court were whether to grant the husband's application and the applications made by the second to ninth respondents. The court was also required to consider whether to impose a pleadings regime, and if so, the timeframe for making such an application.
Tree J dismissed both the husband's application and the applications made by the second to ninth respondents. The court further ordered that any party wishing to apply for the imposition of a pleadings regime must do so within twenty-eight days of the date of the orders.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Gregg and Gregg and Ors [2019] FamCA 927
Most Recent Citation
Hertwig and Hertwig (No 2) [2021] FamCA 286
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
2
Bretton & Bondai
[2013] FamCAFC 168
Lysaght Building Solutions Pty Ltd v Blanalko Pty Ltd
[2013] VSCA 158
Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia
[2010] HCA 28