| [2015] FWCA 2037 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Greg Brand Plumbing Pty Ltd
(AG2014/10273)
BRAND EXCAVATIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 25 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the Brand Excavations Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brand Excavations Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Greg Brand Plumbing Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Fair Work Commission (FWC) received correspondence dated 29 January 2015, which included further material in support of the application together with Undertakings made by and duly signed by the Director, proposed to FWC pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings).
[4] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 25 March 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Undertaking
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE413202 PR562382>
- AGLC
- Greg Brand Plumbing Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 2037
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 2037
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was not in the best interests of the employees. The Commission noted that the agreement did not provide for adequate protection of employee entitlements, particularly in relation to overtime and penalty rates. The Commission also found that the agreement did not provide for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes between employees and employers. The Commission held that the agreement was not in the best interests of the employees and refused to approve it. The Commission noted that the agreement did not provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including wages, hours of work, and other employment conditions.
The Fair Work Commission refused to approve the Brand Excavations Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018. The Commission found that the agreement did not provide for adequate protection of employee entitlements and did not provide for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes. The Commission held that the agreement was not in the best interests of the employees and refused to approve it.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.